Check out this post on Anna’s Against the Grain blog.
After all my years in banking, this kind of thing shouldn’t surprise me. But with food, it does! The difference is, when a bank acquires another bank, the acquired bank effectively ceases to exist - when Bank of America bought Fleet, you stopped seeing the Fleet brand. (Sad for any New Englander interested in history, since it was one of the oldest banking brands.) So you can’t help but notice that a merger has been effected and money (or, really, stock) has changed hands.
But when General Mills acquires Muir Glen, you still see the Muir Glen brand everywhere. I guess it has more cachet than suddenly seeing “General Mills Organic Tomatoes.” But doesn’t it seem sort of deceptive? I thought I was buying those tomatoes from a certain kind of business, and now it turns out I’m buying them from a completely different kind of business.
Plus, when banks swallow other banks, there is at least some show made of having public hearings. You can’t fail to notice if your do-gooder community bank gets bought by another to whose practices you object. But if a producer of organic food is swallowed up by some giant corporation that, in its other lines of business, buys tainted food from China, irradiates its spices, uses milk from cows fed rBST, buys genetically modified corn from Archer Daniels Midland, and makes baby formula out of Roundup-sprayed soybeans - well, unless you have habit of combing through the back pages of the business section, you may never know about it, and even if you know about it, there’s unlikely to be a public hearing, and even if there is a public hearing, the hearing is not exactly shouted from the rooftops the way it is in banking.
The rationale for this in the banking industry is that banks control the money supply, and therefore they control the economy, so we have to be careful what we allow them to do. I don’t disagree (too much) with this principle, but … isn’t food even more important than money? What about the people who control the food supply? Whether you believe in more regulation or less, shouldn’t we at least have the right to know who is producing our food?
Migraine aura picture from



I’ve been following that too; it’s pretty eye-opening. I think these companies are all too happy to lure us into believing we’re still buying the small brand. Your comparison to banking is interesting.
I’d like to look around and see if anyone’s maintaining a site that shows which small-seeming, organic brands are still actually small. If there are any left, that is.
In the meantime, if I can make it myself, then at least I know where it came from. Unless General Mills buys me without my knowledge. That would be scary.
Food Is Love
Comment by Huckleberry — March 17, 2008 @ 2:08 pm
Or in banking you at least get hybrid names “ING Barings”… maybe even “JPM Bear” (or how about “JPM BS”)!
But “GM Muir” somehow doesn’t have a nice ring to it.
Comment by missbossy — March 18, 2008 @ 3:12 am
Michael Pollan wrote a fantastic article about this phenomenon in 2001. It was on the cover of the NY Times Magazine. It’s lengthy, but worth the read.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C03E5DE163BF930A25756C0A9679C8B63&scp=1&sq=michael+pollan+organic&st=nyt
Comment by Vesna — March 19, 2008 @ 8:52 pm