I am stuck at my company’s semiannual sales meeting, and I’m cranky because the food has been so abominable. Lots of pasta, lots of bagels, lots of cereal, lots of desserts. Even the “legal” foods have been terrible. All the salad dressings are loaded with sugar. The scrambled eggs are dreadful. The lunch protein choices have been dried-out, overcooked hamburgers; dried-out, overcooked boneless, skinless chicken breasts; and hot dogs.
Folks, it’s bad when the best food choice on the menu is a hot dog.
Oh, and the breakfast bacon has been decent. But rumors to the contrary, low-carbers do not live on bacon alone, though this week it certainly seems like it.
One morning I helped myself to four, count ‘em, four egg and cheese croissant sandwiches in order to get enough protein to last until lunch. The croissants I shucked off and piled up like the giant pile of shells left over from a crab feast.
At most of the breakfasts, there hasn’t even been any fruit. Fruit juice, yes, but as I’ve said so many times before, fruit juice is junk food in a health food suit.
Dinner, at least, has been at restaurants, and I’ve had a fair amount of autonomy in choosing restaurants and ordering food. San Francisco has some pretty good food. I had a fantastic cioppino the other night.
But I can’t wait until tomorrow, when I will step off the red-eye, head home, and choose and prepare my own breakfast.
Looking at what people eat for breakfast is fascinating. Lots of people ate the cold cereal, many with skim milk. Many others had bagels or pastries. Comparatively few ate the eggs, bacon, sausage, and potatoes. Most of the conference attendees are sales people (I’m not), and they are very young and slim and apparently healthy. I couldn’t help wondering what they’ll look like in ten or fifteen years, whether they’ll struggle with their weight, whether nagging health problems will creep up on them in their 30s and 40s. How many will become diabetic? How many will start experiencing joint inflammation? How many women will have fertility issues, or problematic pregnancies?
I am fascinated by the concept of biochemical individuality, the notion that different people can thrive on different diets. But I often think that people don’t quite get how this works. The fact that someone in their 20s can appear to be healthy on a carb-heavy diet does not mean that it won’t catch up to them later. I was very thin and apparently healthy in my carb-consuming 20s, too.
In fact, one of the reasons that there’s so much controversy about what constitutes a healthy diet is that bad food is slow poison. If we all became fat and diabetic, with aching joints and cognitive difficulties, immediately after eating bagels, we would all know right away that bagels are a bad idea. But the effects of bad diets are cumulative and can take years or even decades to show up.
I think of this a lot. I am sure I come across in my blog as very sure of myself, but that’s the face I put forward. The truth is, I don’t know what to eat any more than the next person. I have a few cues – ugly blood sugar incidents, weight loss and weight gain, aches and pains waxing and waning, skin clearing up or breaking out, stable moods or mood swings – that give me some indication of what I should eat, and more important, what is slow poison. But what will happen in a decade? I think I know – I think that I’ll continue to manage my weight effectively, avoid aches and pains, and maintain stable blood sugar and moods. But truth be told, the very young people all around me eating Special K with skim milk for breakfast probably believe the same about themselves.
It’s lunch time, and I’m starving – time to see whether today we are having bad chicken or bad burgers!
(P.S. When I left home a week ago, I was down 3 pounds. However, I am sure that some of that was due to water and muscle loss from the stomach flu. I can’t wait to get home and weigh in.)
Migraine aura picture from



Hey, pop over to my new blog chubbybuddies.wordpress.com for some online weight-loss buddies. I’ve just started it, so invite anybody you know that wants to lose weight, and let’s encourage each other!
Kathy
Comment by womantowomancbe — January 8, 2008 @ 4:36 pm |
A couple of comments…don’t mean to sound negative but…there are people who can eat a lot of carbs and remain healthy into old age. My step-dad is an example…in his late 60’s he’s extremely healthy….eats a lot of carbs, lot of meat, and fries everything. Never gains an ounce either. Not everyone needs to eat a low carb diet.
You are so intense in your passion and belief of low carb as the only way, that you will loose people…being too intense comes across as arrogant and intolerant of any opposing position. You come across as if you discount others opinions, so they will in turn discount your opinion.
And healthwise, you are not very well—and some could attribute that to your current diet…
I’ve found when it comes to health issues it’s not always just one thing…more often it’s a combination of things.
Again, don’t want to sound mean or negative, but this is what I was thinking…
Also, I honestly don’t think one croissant would really harm you…
Again, I don’t mean to sound unkind…I enjoy reading your blog.
Comment by Cathy — January 8, 2008 @ 10:00 pm |
Stick to your guns, Dianne. You have had to learn what real food is the hard way and it is very very hard. You know what is good for you and if you need reminders, go back to Gary Taubes.
Comment by Marilyn — January 8, 2008 @ 10:15 pm |
It’s funny. I subscribed to your blog ages ago back when you were talking about migraines primarily.
Now, I have recently changed my diet to one of high protein, low carb (Protein Power specifically). So your blog covers two of my major interests!
I wanted to thank you for your insightful and intelligent posts. You express yourself very well! Very nice to read.
Anyway, I thought I’d de-lurk and comment.
And, just so you know, I didn’t have the same response to the post as Cathy did. In fact, I was impressed with how you were open to, and even accepting of, the existence of “biochemical individuality.” Sure, there are people who can eat tons of carbs and appear healthy at 70.
But, the question is, is this big carb eater just like we all know a grandmother or grandfather who smokes two packs a day and lives to 100?
By the way, it’s “lose” people, not “loose” people (not to be mean, just a pet peeve of mine).
And, since starting a low-carb diet about two weeks ago, I haven’t had a single migraine. I usually have 1-2 a week!
Please, don’t lose your passion!
Comment by HSP Woman — January 9, 2008 @ 1:15 am |
Happy New Year, Dianne! I’m with you on dissecting the breakfast sandwiches for something halfway decent to eat.
Comment by Anna — January 9, 2008 @ 2:13 pm |
You go girl! I am a bit nervous about an upcoming conference and how I am going to get myself to a decent, low-carb, high-protein food trough.
My neuro suggested the low-carb is probably helping with the inflammation in my head. The fatties in my office look at my disappearing body with jealousy and spout bad nutritional advice at me. I love egging them on.
Comment by baldsue — January 9, 2008 @ 6:03 pm |
Being a vegetarian, I’ve been doing the dissecting food thing for years. You have to get creative to find things to eat at functions like that.
Comment by Migraine Chick — January 9, 2008 @ 7:08 pm |
Hi!
Why not try oatmeal for breakfast It’s easy to prepare. The best!
Aldrin
Comment by aldrinmeeks — January 9, 2008 @ 9:18 pm |
Hi, all – I wish I had time to respond to all your comments in the detail they deserve. But heck, I barely have time to write new entries, much less respond.
So just a few quick thoughts, in no particular order. Aldrin, I don’t eat oatmeal for breakfast for one simple reason. If I eat oatmeal for breakfast, I am hungry again by the time I get to work 45 minutes later.
Cathy, I do appreciate your comments. I think the reason that low-carbers like myself come across as so self-assured is because we have to in order to survive. It is still a minority lifestyle. That sense of being beleaguered is one of the things I was trying to capture in this post. Anybody at this conference who wanted to follow a low-fat diet had four or five food choices at every breakfast: cereals, bagels, sweetened lowfat yogurt, fat-free milk, etc. I was stuck with whatever institutional variation on eggs they came up with, and the day with the croissants was the last straw, because that WAS the egg choice – teensy squares of egg wrapped in a giant piece of bread. And no, one croissant, even a giant one, wouldn’t have killed me. That was another point of the post – bad food kills us slowly, not quickly. But a week of justifying my food choices as “a little bit won’t hurt,” and the next thing I know I’m fighting off my sugar addiction again. Finally, I would correct your sentence from “And healthwise, you are not very well” to “And healthwise, you WERE not very well.” I am doing much better on low-carb than on any other diet I’ve tried. You’re right, someone could attribute my health issues to low-carb. But that someone would need a lesson in chronology.
HSP Woman – nice to see you again. You were one of the first people who commented on my blog when I started it earlier this year. Glad you’re back.
Migraine Chickie – yes, vegetarians, low-carbers, and people with food allergies become experts at discrimination at the buffet. A co-worker of mine has a half dozen food allergies, and she and I joked a lot about selective dining.
Sending a wave and a shout to everyone else.
Comment by Migraineur — January 10, 2008 @ 12:01 pm |
To HSP Woman—thanks for pointing out my typographical error. I do know the difference between lose and loose…I’m just not a very good typist. You shouldn’t assume people don’t know their grammar.
Health is a relative term. To a person such as I, a cancer survivor, making it to 100 would be no mean feat.
Comment by Cathy — January 11, 2008 @ 5:33 pm |